I agree with radio talk show host Michael Savage on his contention that Mitt Romney is a fall guy for the Republicans. McCain was their fall guy back in 2008. The Republicans were just getting ready to loot America's treasury, which they did in September 08, when they nominated McCain in August 2008. The Republicans knew that President Bush was so unpopular and that they were going to be stealing lots of money from Americans by bailing out the banks, so they nominated a tough war hero who was able to take the lumps and who was on their side but simply wouldn't be able to actually win. It's obvious that the controllers wanted the Republicans to lose; the people needed to know that the another party (the Democrats) were going to save the economy from the implosion caused by the Republicans.
They, those who make the decisions in this country, wanted Romney, the more polished candidate, to sit out because he can actually win. But that didn't mean that they could put him up to lose. So Romney was an insider who they knew could win, which made him a more versatile tool than McCain.
Now, to an extent, they are trying to portray the Republicans as the saviors, or at least any establishment which is to the right of Obama is trying to portray Romney as the savior for anyone against Obama. It's possible that the controllers believe that Obama can get away with more than someone like Romney could, or maybe they have harsher plans for 2016 (see Marco Rubio and his foreign policy) and they wanted a savior after 8 years of Obama like Obama was after Bush. Rubio could certainly be that right wing hero who would demolish who ever runs against him after 8 years of the current administration.
As far as my estimation, there can only be one of two reasons for the constant barrage of Romney this and Romney that. He's a fall guy. Or, they want to see how much they can get away with from the public - i.e. putting up someone who has flip-flopped on every issue during an election cycle when more people than ever claim that they are looking for honesty and consistency.
No comments:
Post a Comment